<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/">
 <dc:title xml:lang="en">GENERATION Z AND CONSUMER BEHAVIOR: BRAND IDENTIFICATION, PERCEIVED AUTHENTICITY AND PURCHASE INTENTION</dc:title>
 <dc:creator>Andrade, Geovanna Neres</dc:creator>
 <dc:creator>Vera, Larissa Rodrigues</dc:creator>
 <dc:creator>Oliveira, Nicole Hellen Souza</dc:creator>
 <dc:creator>Silvestre, Rafaela Gabrielle Fernandes</dc:creator>
 <dc:creator>Bizutti, Rafaela Sanches</dc:creator>
 <dc:creator>Freitas, Prof. Me. Eder</dc:creator>
 <dc:subject xml:lang="en">Generation Z</dc:subject>
 <dc:subject xml:lang="en">Consumer behavior</dc:subject>
 <dc:subject xml:lang="en">Brand identification</dc:subject>
 <dc:subject xml:lang="en">Brand authenticity</dc:subject>
 <dc:subject xml:lang="en">Purchase intention</dc:subject>
 <dc:description xml:lang="en">Introduction: Generation Z consumes in a digital environment saturated with campaigns, and brand authenticity and brand identification are seen as relevant bonds, yet they are rarely tested together. Objective: to analyze what the literature supports about the effects of brand identification and perceived authenticity on Generation Z's purchase intention. Methods: integrative review with Crossref and PubMed queries (10/28/2026; 54 records screened, 5 included) and a directed search of 15 works, totaling 20, with thematic analysis, an evidence map and a documentary analysis of two cases (Calvin Klein and Duolingo). Results: the relations between identification and intention and between authenticity and intention have moderate support; those between authenticity and identification and the mediating role of identification, limited. Case indicators show reach and engagement, not identification or intention. Conclusion: a conceptual model with four propositions is proposed, still untested, which calls for empirical studies with Generation Z. The study is bibliographic.</dc:description>
 <dc:publisher>Oxton Education</dc:publisher>
 <dc:date>2026-11-10</dc:date>
 <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
 <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
 <dc:type xml:lang="en">Review article</dc:type>
 <dc:identifier>https://oriregistry.org/10001/2026.0010</dc:identifier>
 <dc:source>Oxton Science Journal; v. 2 n. 1 (2026); 33-47</dc:source>
 <dc:source>3086-0881</dc:source>
 <dc:language>en</dc:language>
 <dc:relation>https://oxtonscience.com/article/18/</dc:relation>
 <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess</dc:rights>
 <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
